Thursday, June 11, 2009
I will attempt to do a reflection of what happened since our last bull run and the events that occured during this period. For those you who have followed the events closely might find this boring, so just bear with me.
In the year end of 2008, the credit crunch, threatened to be Wall Street’s biggest crisis since the Great Depression. Hundreds of billions in mortgage-related investments soured and reputable investment banks crumbled.
Borrowings almost went to a stop due to liquidity worries affecting businesses of all sizes.
In response, the
The last credit crisis is the burst of the tech bubble of the late 1990’s. Sock market began a steep decline in 2000 and US went into recession the following year and interest rates were sharply in hope to limit the damage.
Due to the lower interest rates, houses became cheaper and demand for homes increased, sending prices up. It also gave homeowners the opportunities to refinance their loans.
Things turned sour when home buyers had to leverage themselves to the max to make a purchase. Defaults began to rise in 2006, but lending/borrowing did not slow. The highly intelligent institutions, Banks and other financial institutions, devised complex financial instruments to distribute and resell the mortgage-backed securities and to hedge against any risks.
“The First Bomb”
The first bomb was when2 hedge funds owned by the MIGHTY Bear Stearns collapse. Foreclosures, in fact, helped speed up the fall of housing prices, and default on mortgages increased.
In a very bold move, the Fed helped in “closing the deal” by selling Bear Sterns to JP Morgan at the initial price of USD $2/share. This amount I think/read/assume should be lower than the price of the Manhattan Office building, Bear Stearns owned.
“The Giants”
In August, stock prices of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac went into a free fall and the
“It never rains but pours.” In Sept again, talks to salvage Lehman Bro broke down and the news of this investment giant’s collapse sent shockwaves throughout the globe, not only the financial systems. In the same time frame, Merrill Lynch another GIANT, sold itself to Bank of American to avoid bankruptcy. At this point, things became very clear. All hopes seemed lost.
In the same month, American Insurance Group, was thankfully bailed out by
Such companies which were supposed to be known for it’s capital management intelligence, failed in their own playing field.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long story... to be continued.
Monday, June 1, 2009
President Obama will push General Motors into bankruptcy protection on Monday, making a risky bet that by temporarily nationalizing the onetime icon of American capitalism, he can save at least a diminished automaker that is competitive.
The company will also have to shed 21,000 union workers and close 12 to 20 factories, steps that most analysts thought could never be pushed through by a Democratic president allied with organized labor.
To assist in the restructuring, the automaker is expected to hire the consulting firm Alix Partners, which has worked on several major bankruptcies, including those for Enron and Kmart. One of the firm’s partners, Al Koch, is expected to manage the liquidation of corporate assets that G.M. will shed during its Chapter 11 restructuring, people with knowledge of the strategy said.
On Monday, Mr. Obama is expected to argue that any alternative to his plan would be worse, and that a liquidation of G.M. — the only other real option — would send the unemployment rate soaring over 10 percent and would radiate damage throughout the economy.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/business/01auto.html?pagewanted=1
Thursday, May 28, 2009
For those who follow my blog post would know that whenever Man Utd is involved in big games, 'll normally post.
Article by Jason Zweig, Author of the Intelligent Investor
It is sometimes said that to be an intelligent investor, you must be unemotional. That isn't true; instead, you should be inversely emotional.
Even after recent turbulence, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is up roughly 30% since its low in March. It is natural for you to feel happy or relieved about that. But Benjamin Graham believed, instead, that you should train yourself to feel worried about such events.
At this moment, consulting Mr. Graham's wisdom is especially fitting. Sixty years ago, on May 25, 1949, the founder of financial analysis published his book, "The Intelligent Investor," in whose honor this column is named. And today the market seems to be in just the kind of mood that would have worried Mr. Graham: a jittery optimism, an insecure and almost desperate need to believe that the worst is over.
You can't turn off your feelings, of course. But you can, and should, turn them inside out.
Stocks have suddenly become more expensive to accumulate. Since March, according to data from Robert Shiller of Yale, the price/earnings ratio of the S&P 500 index has jumped from 13.1 to 15.5. That's the sharpest, fastest rise in almost a quarter-century. (As Graham suggested, Prof. Shiller uses a 10-year average P/E ratio, adjusted for inflation.)
Over the course of 10 weeks, stocks have moved from the edge of the bargain bin to the full-price rack. So, unless you are retired and living off your investments, you shouldn't be celebrating, you should be worrying.
Mr. Graham worked diligently to resist being swept up in the mood swings of "Mr. Market" -- his metaphor for the collective mind of investors, euphoric when stocks go up and miserable when they go down.
In an autobiographical sketch, Mr. Graham wrote that he "embraced stoicism as a gospel sent to him from heaven." Among the main components of his "internal equipment," he also said, were a "certain aloofness" and "unruffled serenity."
Mr. Graham's last wife described him as "humane, but not human." I asked his son, Benjamin Graham Jr., what that meant. "His mind was elsewhere, and he did have a little difficulty in relating to others," "Buz" Graham said of his father. "He was always internally multitasking. Maybe people who go into investing are especially well-suited for it if they have that distance or detachment."
Mr. Graham's immersion in literature, mathematics and philosophy, he once remarked, helped him view the markets "from the standpoint of eternity, rather than day-to-day."
Perhaps as a result, he almost invariably read the enthusiasm of others as a yellow caution light, and he took their misery as a sign of hope.
His knack for inverting emotions helped him see when markets had run to extremes. In late 1945, as the market was rising 36%, he warned investors to cut back on stocks; the next year, the market fell 8%. As stocks took off in 1958-59, Mr. Graham was again pessimistic; years of jagged returns followed. In late 1971, he counseled caution, just before the worst bear market in decades hit.
In the depths of that crash, near the end of 1974, Mr. Graham gave a speech in which he correctly forecast a period of "many years" in which "stock prices may languish."
Then he startled his listeners by pointing out this was good news, not bad: "The true investor would be pleased, rather than discouraged, at the prospect of investing his new savings on very satisfactory terms." Mr. Graham added a more startling note: Investors would be "enviably fortunate" to benefit from the "advantages" of a long bear market.
Today, it has become trendy to declare that "buy and hold is dead." Some critics regard dollar-cost averaging, or automatically investing a fixed amount every month, as foolish.
Asked if dollar-cost averaging could ensure long-term success, Mr. Graham wrote in 1962: "Such a policy will pay off ultimately, regardless of when it is begun, provided that it is adhered to conscientiously and courageously under all intervening conditions."
For that to be true, however, the dollar-cost averaging investor must "be a different sort of person from the rest of us ... not subject to the alternations of exhilaration and deep gloom that have accompanied the gyrations of the stock market for generations past."
"This," Mr. Graham concluded, "I greatly doubt."
He didn't mean that no one can resist being swept up in the gyrating emotions of the crowd. He meant that few people can. To be an intelligent investor, you must cultivate what Mr. Graham called "firmness of character" -- the ability to keep your own emotional counsel.
Above all, that means resisting the contagion of Mr. Market's enthusiasm when stocks are suddenly no longer cheap.
Credit to: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Monday, May 11, 2009

STI is currently near a resistance as seen from the insert and we are now faced with a gap to cover.
Last Friday we had a selling volume, if my chart is right, and a spinning top on resistance.
In my opinion, we are now at another critical level which might decide if this will become a bearish or bullish scenario. For me, as long as Monday did not break out.. it's bad. But to not be so negative, Wednesday should be the latest we will see any movement.
Personally, I'm still in the camp of... we are too optimistic. Ha! I'm sorry.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Have you ever wondered why do companies always seem to declare liquidity problems only when it's too late?

Saturday, March 14, 2009

The last time I shared my opinion on a bottom is on 7th Jan 09 when Dow Jones seems to break a resistance of 8900. But in that post I did not refer to the charts. To read about my previous post, click here
However, this time round, I'd still see this as a potential rally but not the end of the bear run.
I've used arrows to indicate technical support formed in recent times and highlight the levels with a horizontal line, as you can see from the chart. This time round, I am in the opinion that we should have the "strength" to test 7,500 again, the resistance line formed since Aug 08, a breach of this resistance line would then lead me to rethink abt a sustained rally. Previously, a rally don't last longer than a week, 7 days and at this current time, we have about 3 days left.
I've removed all indicators in my analysis as I think indicators do not work in the current market. The tracking of the change in sentiments by indicators is too slow, in a way. Nevertheless, I do hope that most of you saw the bottom and caught the rally the last 2 days.
Finally, this is just my opinion and open for discussion/critics.
Saturday, March 7, 2009
“I AM the most offensively possessive man on earth. I do something to things. Let me pick up an ashtray from a dime-store counter, pay for it and put it in my pocket—and it becomes a special kind of ashtray, unlike any on earth, because it’s mine.”
The endowment effect is a hypothesis that people value a good more once their property right to it has been established. In other words, people place a higher value on objects they own relative to objects they do not.
The endowment effect was described as inconsistent with standard economic theory which asserts that a person's willingness to pay for a good should be equal to their willingness to accept compensation to be deprived of the good. This hypothesis underlies consumer theory.
‘Thaler (1980) coined the term “endowment effect” to refer to the finding that randomly assigned owners of an object appear to value the object more than randomly assigned non-owners of the object.
Example: Look around your house. Pick something. How much would you sell it for? How much would people really pay for it? How much would you pay for something like this at a second-hand store?
